Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture

From: popinga <"p4..."_at_libero.it>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:25:39 GMT

Il 27 Giu 2009, 20:57, "Dario de Judicibus" <nospam_at_nowhere.com> ha scritto:
> Scusate se dovesse essere un duplicato, ma dal mio newsreader non sono
> riuscito a vedere l'articolo, n� ho ricevuto alcuna comunicazione a
> proposito, quindi assumo che sia andato perso.
 
> I had an intuition, a conjecture, if you prefer. It is not something I can
> demonstrate, so I would not call it a theory. I was not sure if I had to
> publish it, because it could be simply a crazy idea that some good
physicist
> might destroy in few minutes. Or maybe it is a good guess. After two
months
> since I had the first idea I decided to risk to be considered ridicolous
and
> to publish it anyway. In the worst of cases you may think I am foolish,
but
> if I am right, it could be a big change in the way we think the origin of
> universe. So I posted it on my blog and I am sharing the link in the web
to
> allow people more expert than me to review it. That is all. The link is
>
http://lindipendente.splinder.com/post/20836267/The+anti-Big+Bang+conjecture
> . I would appreciate competent comments, anyway, not just �you are mad,
> guy!�. Thank you in advance.

Chiss� se nell'anti-universo i nostri colleghi anti-fisici hanno gi�
scoperto la "anti-antimateria"...

--------------------------------
Inviato via http://arianna.libero.it/usenet/
Received on Thu Jul 02 2009 - 01:25:39 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Feb 10 2025 - 04:23:32 CET