Re: Conducibilit� termica

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Ernest <ernesto77_at_libero.it>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:02:37 -0700

> stesso, ovvero Q1 = Q2 = Q3 = Q, altrimenti si avrebbe accumulo di calore.
> Perch�?!

Per la conservazione dell'energia!
Received on Mon Oct 01 2007 - 17:02:37 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: marcofuics: "Re: spettro di corpo nero"
Previous message: salvo: "Attualità di Feynman"
Maybe in reply to: Rocky3: "Conducibilità termica"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 21 2024 - 05:10:10 CET