Re: Vuoto quantistico

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: El Che <fidel.castro_at_cubba.nett>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:15:05 +0200

tony wrote:

> A monte per� deve esserci sempre o una particella
> o un campo elettromagntico.

Non ho capito questa frase. Che intendi?
Received on Sat Oct 01 2011 - 11:15:05 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Franco: "Re: velocità della luce/ corrente elettrica"
Previous message: amoroso_at_mclink.it: "Vedere la Scienza: rassegna film/documentari scientifici - Milano, 7-13 marzo 2005"
Maybe in reply to: tony: "Vuoto quantistico"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 21 2024 - 05:10:22 CET