Re: Re: Chiarimenti sulla Massa a Riposo.

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Pavesi Giovanni <g.pavesi_at_netvalley.it>
Date: 2000/11/29

Perche' non la chiamiamo semplicemente massa, ne' "inerziale" ne'
"a riposo"? O, tutt'al piu', massa "invariante"?
Bye
Paola

-- 
Posted from mail.netvalley.it [212.239.58.131] 
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Received on Wed Nov 29 2000 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Goffredo Pierpaoli: "Re: Camera a scintille"
Previous message: Pavesi Giovanni: "Re: Re: (la sol. e' giusta o no?)"
Maybe in reply to: Valar: "Re: Chiarimenti sulla Massa a Riposo."
Next in thread: Adriano Amaricci: "Re: Re: Chiarimenti sulla Massa a Riposo."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jan 20 2025 - 04:23:14 CET