Re: Non viaggeremo nello spazio?

From: not1xor1 <">
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:46:25 +0200

Il 31/07/2011 16:09, pirke ha scritto:

> Sembra che l'uomo abbia raggiunto il suo massimo di intelligenza.

i limiti (opinabili) del cervello umano non implicano limiti -
raggiungibili con uno sforzo collettivo - alla portata delle scoperte
scientifiche raggiungibili

> Niente viaggi spaziali alla star trek?

non so se questo effetto possa essere sfruttato in qualche modo :-)

"Inertial mass has not been well understood and has been assumed to be
the same as gravitational mass (the Equivalence Principle, EP),"
McCulloch explained. "If MiHsC is correct, then the EP is only an
approximation (the small deviation from the EP due to MiHsC could not
have been detected in torsion balance experiments, as I explain in the
Discussion of my paper). As a result there may be implications for
General Relativity since this assumes the EP is true (and therefore
also implications for low-acceleration phenomena like the orbits of
stars at the edge of galaxies). Inertia is important practically since
it determines the sensitivity of an object's motion to outside forces."
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/95/39002>
<http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-07-gyroscope-unexplained-due-inertia.html>

naturalmente li faremo progettare alla prima intelligenza artificiale
che superer� quella umana :-)


-- 
bye
!(!1|1)
Received on Sun Jul 31 2011 - 21:46:25 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 21 2024 - 05:10:24 CET